| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
| Subject: | Re: Refactoring speculative insertion with unique indexes a little |
| Date: | 2016-01-18 20:14:28 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZRuOBOjncaikfwukGmwX8Dqc2=gg_JbOuZfakugCC2+SA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> That's because I believe this is quite broken, as already pointed out.
>
> I think I like your approach better.
That makes things far simpler, then.
>> Your premise here is that what Heikki said in passing months ago is
>> incontrovertibly the right approach. That's ridiculous. I think Heikki
>> and I could work this out quite quickly, if he engaged, but for
>> whatever reason he appears unable to. I doubt that Heikki thinks that
>> about what he said, so why do you?
>
> I don't -- I just think you could have sent a patch that addressed all
> the other points, leave this one as initially submitted, and note that
> the new submission left it unaddressed because you disagreed.
I'll try to do that soon. I've got a very busy schedule over the next
couple of weeks, though.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2016-01-18 20:19:02 | Re: Removing service-related code in pg_ctl for Cygwin |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2016-01-18 19:56:43 | Re: Refactoring speculative insertion with unique indexes a little |