Re: A Typo in regress/sql/privileges.sql

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tatsuro Yamada <yamada(dot)tatsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A Typo in regress/sql/privileges.sql
Date: 2015-12-22 09:36:52
Message-ID: CAM3SWZRrWVfsJLQTSrW8kA2x2dwWvUd+ZBPtR2HsuFiKi3swvg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Mind you, I don't think "inference specification" is very good
> terminology, but what's there right now is just wrong.

It doesn't appear in the documentation. The term "inference
specification" only appears where it's necessary to precisely describe
the input to unique index inference.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2015-12-22 09:44:02 Re: Some bugs in psql_complete of psql
Previous Message Dilip Kumar 2015-12-22 09:14:11 Re: parallel joins, and better parallel explain