Re: Refactoring speculative insertion with unique indexes a little

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Subject: Re: Refactoring speculative insertion with unique indexes a little
Date: 2015-12-19 23:28:58
Message-ID: CAM3SWZRhhzsM6EjV1ykiVh9CWtWGV5YCRzbd-e49Tvt73zviVw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> +1. There are folks around doing tests using 9.5 now, it is not
> correct to impact the effort they have been putting on it until now.

This is a total misrepresentation of what I've said.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-12-19 23:36:10 Re: Making tab-complete.c easier to maintain
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2015-12-19 23:26:43 Re: Refactoring speculative insertion with unique indexes a little