| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT syntax issues |
| Date: | 2015-05-07 17:41:04 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZRaqft8L4RwjG9tqbg3kk9DiXtrwvGznze0zujoy-2Sqw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> I don't see a problem at all, with one exception: If we want the AS to
> be optional like in a bunch of other places, we have to either promote
> VALUES to a reserved keyword, only accept unreserved keywords, or play
> precedence games. I think it'd be perfectly fine to not make AS
> optional.
+1. In any case, we can't very well not support having any alias on the target.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2015-05-07 18:16:12 | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT error messages |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2015-05-07 17:37:22 | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT syntax issues |