Re: debug_sortsupport GUC?

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: debug_sortsupport GUC?
Date: 2015-03-22 22:51:19
Message-ID: CAM3SWZR_Phf6Bcq7XwCRu0Ck28biw+oj-GuKbYgrBrfYdOjB3g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 8:28 PM, Andrew Gierth
<andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> wrote:
> So if these debugging elogs are to be kept at all, I propose that rather
> than being compile-time options they should be controlled by a
> debug_sortsupport GUC. Opinions?

This seems like a reasonable idea. Why wouldn't it just be under the
existing trace_sort GUC, though? That's been enabled by default since
8.1. It's already defined in pg_config_manual.h.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Kirkwood 2015-03-22 23:06:16 Re: Remove fsync ON/OFF as a visible option?
Previous Message Вадим Горбачев 2015-03-22 22:28:22 proposal GSoC 2015 task: Allow access to the database via HTTP