Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT IGNORE (and UPDATE) 3.0

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: svenne(at)krap(dot)dk
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT IGNORE (and UPDATE) 3.0
Date: 2015-04-21 00:23:16
Message-ID: CAM3SWZRZ0hVxKSGT=bPnAPeigxPcQ53ocjtrd8AP5RKWK65rwQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 9:37 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> Attached patch, V3.4, implements what I believe you and Heikki have in
> mind here.

Any plans to look at this, Svenne? You are signed up as a reviewer on
the commitfest app. A review of the documentation, and interactions
with other features like inheritance, updatable views and postgres_fdw
would be useful at this point. Obviously I've gone to a lot of effort
to document how things fit together at a high level on the UPSERT wiki
page, but these aspects have not been commented on all that much.

Thanks
--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2015-04-21 01:04:25 Re: Parallel Seq Scan
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2015-04-20 23:59:43 Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.