| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: checkpointer continuous flushing - V18 |
| Date: | 2016-03-11 07:25:59 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZRKyEvnKUu-YEEoHY=AXZWH+zSRyR05Ckc3xQXCSRqWJQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> wrote:
> I can only concur!
>
> The "Performance Tips" chapter (II.14) is more user/query oriented. The
> "Server Administration" bool (III) does not discuss this much.
That's definitely one area in which the docs are lacking -- I've heard
several complaints about this myself. I think we've been hesitant to
do more in part because the docs must always be categorically correct,
and must not use weasel words. I think it's hard to talk about
performance while maintaining the general tone of the documentation. I
don't know what can be done about that.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vladimir Sitnikov | 2016-03-11 08:00:05 | Re: Proposal: RETURNING primary_key() |
| Previous Message | Fabien COELHO | 2016-03-11 07:24:59 | Re: checkpointer continuous flushing |