| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
| Cc: | Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Tuplesort merge pre-reading |
| Date: | 2016-09-12 19:09:22 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZRGDoVSS7RFDdG8phzXakgNR-wMUDbHOq6G8TVKjy=DWA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:
> Here's a fixed version. I'll go through Peter's comments and address those,
> but I don't think there was anything there that should affect performance
> much, so I think you can proceed with your benchmarking with this version.
> (You'll also need to turn off assertions for that!)
I agree that it's unlikely that addressing any of my feedback will
result in any major change to performance.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2016-09-12 19:26:57 | Re: pg_basebackup wish list |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2016-09-12 19:07:40 | Re: Tuplesort merge pre-reading |