| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | False comment about speculative insertion |
| Date: | 2015-07-26 19:30:47 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZREwGaudXGupgbYtTDNYERHZtP=daqL-dXYY7sVriGXCA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Attached patch removes a reference to an executor README section about
speculative insertion. In fact, the high-level overview of speculative
insertion ended up at the top of execIndexing.c. The executor README
was not touched by the ON CONFLICT patch at all.
I don't think it's necessary to refer to execIndexing.c within
ExecInsert instead. All the routines being called from ExecInsert()
that relate to speculative insertion are in execIndexing.c anyway.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-Remove-false-comment-about-speculative-insertion.patch | text/x-patch | 1.0 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-07-26 21:48:33 | Re: Failing assertions in indxpath.c, placeholder.c and brin_minmax.c |
| Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2015-07-26 19:15:18 | Re: MultiXact member wraparound protections are now enabled |