Re: Nitpicking: unnecessary NULL-pointer check in pg_upgrade's controldata.c

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Nitpicking: unnecessary NULL-pointer check in pg_upgrade's controldata.c
Date: 2015-06-26 18:49:50
Message-ID: CAM3SWZRCQghtg5dKBerbsqFe-0nPfVcxiGWYed=N=VaLBhn8yA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I agree that the correct handling of this particular case is to mark it
> as not-a-bug. We have better things to do.

+1

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2015-06-26 18:53:43 Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-06-26 18:47:57 Re: Nitpicking: unnecessary NULL-pointer check in pg_upgrade's controldata.c