Re: tuplesort_gettuple_common() and *should_free argument

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: hlinnaka <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: tuplesort_gettuple_common() and *should_free argument
Date: 2016-12-12 21:22:25
Message-ID: CAM3SWZR7zjNKznp7SqFbyRT6Ks7mvFCyoRO3U6a3bJ79pta8Jg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Committed 0001.

Thanks.

I should have already specifically pointed out that the original
discussion on what became 0002-* is here:
postgr.es/m/7256.1476711733@sss.pgh.pa.us

As I said already, the general idea seems uncontroversial.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2016-12-12 21:42:27 Re: snapbuild woes
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-12-12 21:21:44 Re: Hash Indexes