Re: Confusing remark about UPSERT in fdwhandler.sgml

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Confusing remark about UPSERT in fdwhandler.sgml
Date: 2015-10-02 08:04:19
Message-ID: CAM3SWZQvQVEBnnKw_2qtKW4vDjBtZdiDVsFyuAPA0er4oWcPPw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Etsuro Fujita
<fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> ISTM that the sentence "as remote constraints are not locally known" is
> somewhat confusing, because check constrains on remote tables can be
> defined locally in 9.5. How about "unique constraints or exclusion
> constraints on remote tables are not locally known"? Attached is a
> patch for that.

Makes sense to me.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2015-10-02 08:26:39 Re: Foreign join pushdown vs EvalPlanQual
Previous Message Etsuro Fujita 2015-10-02 08:00:41 Confusing remark about UPSERT in fdwhandler.sgml