Re: [PATCH] Add EXPLAIN (ALL) shorthand

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: David Christensen <david(at)endpoint(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add EXPLAIN (ALL) shorthand
Date: 2016-05-19 20:02:12
Message-ID: CAM3SWZQtno6CR7aywS7tyLkDe=FrvZ=zhTQ-qXmUJXdDuuNhiQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure this is well thought out. It would mean for example that
> we could never implement EXPLAIN options that are mutually exclusive
> ... at least, not without having to redefine ALL as all-except-something.
> Non-boolean options would be problematic as well.

While the spelling needs work, I like the general idea.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-05-19 20:14:48 Tracking wait event for latches
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-05-19 19:59:40 Re: [PATCH] Add EXPLAIN (ALL) shorthand