From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT IGNORE (and UPDATE) 3.0 |
Date: | 2015-04-17 16:29:15 |
Message-ID: | CAM3SWZQt4LwGPiAMMaoyZkgop1P1oLCV2EsmeXVBtQqppxUNDQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 4:54 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> Dean, I've been working through your patches over the past couple of
> days (apologies for the lack of updates, just been busy) and hope to
> push them very shortly (ie: by the end of the weekend).
>
> One thing that I was hoping to discuss a bit is that I've gone ahead and
> added another set of hooks, so we can have both "permissive" and
> "restrictive" policies be provided from the hook. It's a bit late to
> make the grammar and other changes which would be required to add a
> "restrictive" policy option to the built-in RLS, but adding the hooks is
> relatively low-impact.
I came up with something that is along the lines of what we discussed.
I'll wait for you to push Dean's code, and rebase on top of that
before submitting what I came up with. Maybe this can be rolled into
my next revision if I work through Andres' most recent feedback
without much delay.
--
Peter Geoghegan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2015-04-17 17:12:32 | Re: Replication identifiers, take 4 |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2015-04-17 15:09:45 | Re: TABLESAMPLE patch |