Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem
Date: 2013-10-10 18:44:04
Message-ID: CAM3SWZQmUvZhRgPe9v11pQc+VGUNO2-xtUOEhjG1UgjXsvWJVg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I don't see why it can't be done in C. The server is written in C,
> and so is initdb. So no matter where we do this, it's gonna be in C.
> Where does Python enter into it?

I mentioned that pgtune was written in Python, but as you say that's
wholly incidental. An equivalent C program would only be slightly more
verbose.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2013-10-10 18:44:12 Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2013-10-10 18:44:01 Re: Compression of full-page-writes