Re: debug_sortsupport GUC?

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: debug_sortsupport GUC?
Date: 2015-03-23 02:11:56
Message-ID: CAM3SWZQiGkLVFwdSCa+WT17eoCp4CYbhap6gMfDk3Sauqa_J1A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 6:59 PM, Andrew Gierth
<andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> wrote:
> Ungh... yes, it's defined by default, but it clearly still requires
> keeping the #ifdefs in there in order to still build if someone manually
> undefines it. Was hoping to avoid the #ifdefs entirely - perhaps the
> existing #ifdefs should just be removed? If it's been enabled since 8.1
> it seems unlikely to be causing anyone any issues.

I'd vote for removing the #ifdefs, and using trace_sort.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2015-03-23 02:49:54 Re: Zero-padding and zero-masking fixes for to_char(float)
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-03-23 02:10:26 Re: Abbreviated keys for Numeric