Re: Bug in point releases 9.3.6 and 9.2.10?

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug in point releases 9.3.6 and 9.2.10?
Date: 2015-03-13 01:01:31
Message-ID: CAM3SWZQhCdumvQBsHL_OwxALADO_8SicYrMj6agNz7PCPDym4g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> So, no hot standby enabled?

Right.

> There've been some issues with seek(END) sometimes returning the wrong
> length in the past. And I've seen a report that might indicate a similar
> bug has been reintroduced. That could certainly cause such anerror.

Perhaps.

>> I am unfamiliar with this provisioning code, so, as I
>> mentioned, offhand I cannot be entirely sure that there isn't some
>> other code run when the problem originally arises (that I should have
>> included in my report).
>
> It's probably worthwhile to dig out what's happening.

I'll get to that after the backtrace.

>> What I can tell you is that I saw the same error messages when I
>> manually ran the statements generated by the above code within a
>> transaction...until I ran "VACUUM FULL pg_auth_members;".
>
> You can reproduce that problem? How easily? If you can, please produce a
> backtrace. It'll certainly be interesting to see whether that access is
> through an index or whatnot.

I suspect I can reproduce it quite easily. The next step should be to
do a backtrace. I'll look at that tomorrow.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Karlsson 2015-03-13 01:23:36 Re: Using 128-bit integers for sum, avg and statistics aggregates
Previous Message Andres Freund 2015-03-13 00:56:37 Re: Bug in point releases 9.3.6 and 9.2.10?