Re: CLUSTER, reform_and_rewrite_tuple(), and parallelism

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CLUSTER, reform_and_rewrite_tuple(), and parallelism
Date: 2016-08-18 00:35:32
Message-ID: CAM3SWZQfnDo+R70k-aLkLQsk3LKSzz_LgSCiMFYEyHbyo9CJKA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> libc isn't compiled with -fno-omit-frame-pointer (and even if, it uses
> assembly without setup of the frame pointer), so frame pointer based
> call graphs are wrong through libc. The attributions are based on
> random stuff in the frame pointer at that point. You either need to use
> dwarf or lbr to get accurate ones.

Is it worth doing that here, and redoing the test, so that the glibc
attributions are correct?

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2016-08-18 00:36:55 Re: CLUSTER, reform_and_rewrite_tuple(), and parallelism
Previous Message Ryan Murphy 2016-08-18 00:30:02 Re: Patch: initdb: "'" for QUOTE_PATH (non-windows)