| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Subject: | Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool) |
| Date: | 2016-09-02 18:19:50 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZQaXwzFu_c3ZWVeUj6-ck62zVVfF47KgB0NP7Hg+BcNBA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> There are only tiny differences, which in any case you can see in the
> commit log on Github. There is no reason why code review needs to
> block on this V3, IMV.
Also, I don't think that we need to include V2's tests now that there
is independent test coverage for external sorts, which is a recent
development. I imagine that the V2 test run duration might be
problematic on some buildfarm animals. I'll omit that in V3.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-09-02 18:53:53 | Re: [PATCH] COPY vs \copy HINT |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2016-09-02 18:19:46 | Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool) |