| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 |
| Date: | 2015-08-12 20:36:35 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZQPgfG8PwbirJ3Eefk_igu0GtzLVcjwsDBrYU4W+VUuOg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:
> Andres didn't mention how big the performance benefit he saw with pgbench
> was, but I bet it was barely distinguishible from noise. But that's OK. In
> fact, there's no reason to believe this would make any difference to
> performance. The point is to make the code more readable, and it certainly
> achieves that.
+1
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2015-08-12 20:37:32 | Re: WIP: SCRAM authentication |
| Previous Message | Fabien COELHO | 2015-08-12 20:34:59 | Re: checkpointer continuous flushing |