Re: Another possible corruption bug in 9.3.2 or possibly a known MultiXact problem?

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Another possible corruption bug in 9.3.2 or possibly a known MultiXact problem?
Date: 2014-02-24 23:05:37
Message-ID: CAM3SWZQNYkRBHEEsRj80qypnpxRsP00HE7x8x-kZ796Ukgm=Ag@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> We somehow need to have a policy of testing changes to the WAL format
> without full_page_writes. They hide bugs in replay far, far too often.

What's the easiest way to get atomic page writes at the FS level on
your laptop? ZFS or some data journaling FS, I suppose.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Haribabu Kommi 2014-02-24 23:15:54 Re: contrib/cache_scan (Re: What's needed for cache-only table scan?)
Previous Message Robert Haas 2014-02-24 22:06:53 Re: Changeset Extraction v7.7