Re: Refactoring speculative insertion with unique indexes a little

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Subject: Re: Refactoring speculative insertion with unique indexes a little
Date: 2016-03-15 00:23:24
Message-ID: CAM3SWZQE50hWSjR0Ka9m1ZKNS6JZm=Bt-x4t1tz6A_OEf5JExw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> So? You're not the only one. I don't see why we shouldn't move this to
> 'returned with feedback' until there's a new version.

I don't see any point in that; I intend to get a revision in to the
ongoing CF. But fine.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2016-03-15 00:48:11 Re: Parallel Aggregate
Previous Message Andres Freund 2016-03-15 00:21:46 Re: Refactoring speculative insertion with unique indexes a little