Re: How about to have relnamespace and relrole?

From: Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: How about to have relnamespace and relrole?
Date: 2015-02-27 12:04:06
Message-ID: CAM2+6=VXJ=_q8zPFKKb+4E9WoFEiy23YXj1TUYjChOuKH2c60w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> The attatched are the fourth version of this patch.
>
> 0001-Add-regrole_v4.patch
> 0002-Add-regnamespace_v4.patch
>

Seems like you have missed to attach both the patches.

--
Jeevan B Chalke
Principal Software Engineer, Product Development
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2015-02-27 12:10:58 Re: Merge compact/non compact commits, make aborts dynamically sized
Previous Message Sergey Shchukin 2015-02-27 11:42:39 Re: Re: [pgadmin-support] Issue with a hanging apply process on the replica db after vacuum works on primary