Re: PL/pgSQL: FOUND is NULL, not false, in event trigger functions

From: Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL: FOUND is NULL, not false, in event trigger functions
Date: 2026-10-27 02:28:04
Message-ID: CAM2+6=U_sCd=A86GAr_iBF2k37U5CPYuK12PQz_M0J_qri3M=w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Oct 27, 2026 at 2:46 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> writes:
> > Ah, I misread and thought you were advocating for what you clearly
> wanted to
> > avoid. Given the lack of complaints then +1 for at most fixing in 19.
> > Backpatching takes a non-trivial amount of time, which really isn't a
> commodity
> > we have plenty of.
>
> Done that way, then.
>

Thanks, Tom.

>
> regards, tom lane
>

--
*Jeevan Chalke*
*Senior Principal Engineer, Engineering Manager*
*Product Development*

enterprisedb.com <https://www.enterprisedb.com>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeevan Chalke 2026-10-27 02:31:33 Re: PL/pgSQL: fix validation of anycompatiblemultirange
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2026-10-27 02:24:26 Re: First draft of PG 19 release notes