Re: WIP/PoC for parallel backup

From: Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Asif Rehman <asifr(dot)rehman(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kashif Zeeshan <kashif(dot)zeeshan(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP/PoC for parallel backup
Date: 2020-04-07 04:15:00
Message-ID: CAM2+6=UY1sppaB8X4JGnVgnYKvg2Ertj0um5V-700B3CpaR6KA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Asif,

After recent backup manifest addition, patches needed to rebase and
reconsideration of a few things like making sure that parallel backup
creates
a manifest file correctly or not etc.

--
Jeevan Chalke
Associate Database Architect & Team Lead, Product Development
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2020-04-07 04:18:47 Re: Spurious "apparent wraparound" via SimpleLruTruncate() rounding
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2020-04-07 03:32:56 Re: Autovacuum on partitioned table (autoanalyze)