Re: Allowing same cursor name in nested levels

From: Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Allowing same cursor name in nested levels
Date: 2011-08-18 04:47:41
Message-ID: CAM2+6=UR8kHO4iH0HjFdgbb8gfgp=uYmn2W8Hnhyy-uXM+NMRw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> > 1. I have two functions func1 and func2.
> > 2. func1 calls func2
> > 3. Both has cursor with same name, say mycursor
> > 4. Somehow I forgot closing it
> > 5. executing func1 throws an error 'cursor "mycursor" already in use'
>
> > Is this expected behavior???
>
> Yes ... or at least, it's always been like that.
>
> > I just mingled around the code and later appended a cursor count to the
> > cursor name to allow same cursor name in nested levels.
>
> That would break code that expects the cursor name to be what it said
> it should be. It is documented that you can refer to cursors by name
> across multiple functions.
>

Hmm... got it.

Thanks for the clarification.

>
> regards, tom lane
>

--
Jeevan B Chalke
Senior Software Engineer, R&D
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Phone: +91 20 30589500

Website: www.enterprisedb.com
EnterpriseDB Blog: http://blogs.enterprisedb.com/
Follow us on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/enterprisedb

This e-mail message (and any attachment) is intended for the use of the
individual or entity to whom it is addressed. This message contains
information from EnterpriseDB Corporation that may be privileged,
confidential, or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not
the intended recipient or authorized to receive this for the intended
recipient, any use, dissemination, distribution, retention, archiving, or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail
and delete this message.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jun Ishiduka 2011-08-18 05:47:25 Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2011-08-18 02:12:55 Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby