Re: Partition-wise aggregation/grouping

From: Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Partition-wise aggregation/grouping
Date: 2017-10-17 17:14:22
Message-ID: CAM2+6=UB5i5wtW-gFvLbJ1P7YUMO7NZdXUTK89EFaUH3sSqu-g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 7:13 PM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Jeevan Chalke
> <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> While playing around with the patch I have noticed one regression with
> the partial partition-wise aggregate.
>
> I am consistently able to reproduce this on my local machine.
>
> Scenario: Group by on non-key column and only one tuple per group.
>

I didn't get what you mean by regression here. Can you please explain?

I see that PWA plan is selected over regular plan when enabled on the basis
of costing.
Regular planning need a Result node due to which costing increases where as
PWA don't need that and thus wins.

--
Jeevan Chalke
Technical Architect, Product Development
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2017-10-17 18:01:46 Re: Is anything preventing us from allowing write to foreign tables from standby?
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2017-10-17 16:52:11 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Implement table partitioning.