Re: can we add SKIP LOCKED to UPDATE?

From: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Torsten Zühlsdorff <mailinglists(at)toco-domains(dot)de>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, 德哥 <digoal(at)126(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: can we add SKIP LOCKED to UPDATE?
Date: 2015-11-12 00:52:31
Message-ID: CAM-w4HP+v66b_G7ZHsKGpwbEqyHECgwWobb9_3THJUaoHrf30g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Gavin Flower
<GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz> wrote:
> Don't you realize that 400MB is over 4 million of the old 100Kb floppy
> disks, and even with the new big 1.44MB 3.5 " disks, you'd need about 280!!!

Don't be silly. It's only four thousand 100Kb floppies.

--
greg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2015-11-12 00:54:40 Re: Parallel Seq Scan
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2015-11-12 00:49:30 Re: Proposal: "Causal reads" mode for load balancing reads without stale data