Re: Enabling Checksums

From: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)mail(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Enabling Checksums
Date: 2012-12-18 15:47:01
Message-ID: CAM-w4HOn6CWfGwF4+Bg_GLP1B00=c8rZNKY2FyOOuTVRk-j_qQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>> There is no good way to make the poor soul who has no standby server
>> happy here. You're just choosing between bad alternatives. The first
>> block error is often just that--the first one, to be joined by others
>> soon afterward. My experience at how drives fail says the second error
>> is a lot more likely after you've seen one.

For what it's worth Oracle allows you to recover a specific block from
backups including replaying the archive logs for that one block.

--
greg

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-12-18 15:47:13 Re: configure.in and setproctitle/optreset problem
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2012-12-18 15:43:01 Re: Enabling Checksums