Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats

From: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats
Date: 2022-02-25 14:52:49
Message-ID: CAM-w4HOdjaW289jE171cQN_xbpU=Jr1aF3KxmH7c4+hz=cwNbQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 at 01:32, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was looking the shared memory stats patch again.

Can you point me to this thread? I looked for it but couldn't find it.

--
greg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nitin Jadhav 2022-02-25 14:56:27 Re: Report checkpoint progress with pg_stat_progress_checkpoint (was: Report checkpoint progress in server logs)
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2022-02-25 14:43:20 Re: Readd use of TAP subtests