| From: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Ivanov <d(dot)ivanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Declarative partitioning - another take |
| Date: | 2016-12-16 08:38:53 |
| Message-ID: | CAM-w4HOZ5fPS7GoCTTrW42q01+wPrOWFCnr9H0iDyVTZP2H1CA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Just poking around with partitioning. I notice that "\d parent"
doesn't list all the partitions, suggesting to use \d+ but a plain
"\d" does indeed list the partitions. That seems a bit strange and
also probably impractical if you have hundreds or thousands of
partitions. Has this come up in previous discussions? Unfortunately
it's proving a bit hard to search for "\d" :/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Langote | 2016-12-16 08:42:54 | Re: Declarative partitioning - another take |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2016-12-16 08:04:50 | Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication. |