Re: Hard to Use WAS: Hard limit on WAL space

From: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>, MauMau <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hard to Use WAS: Hard limit on WAL space
Date: 2013-06-15 16:28:29
Message-ID: CAM-w4HOU+ua=uR1cRZp5eNgJXT_g8NZe7121LMxU774ey0_PPQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> fsync=off

synchronous_commits=off replaced fsync=off in almost every use case
where fsync=off might have been useful. The only remaining use case is
for the initial build of a database. In that case what the user really
wants is to turn off WAL logging entirely though. Having a WAL log and
not fsyncing it is kind of pointless. I guess it lets you replicate
the database but it doesn't let you use the WAL log for recovery
locally.

> Bloat
> ------
>
> Table bloat. Table bloat has been a major issue with PostgreSQL users/admins
> for years. Anyone care to explain to me in a simple paragraph how to find
> out if you have table or index bloat issues in your database and what to do
> about it? (Maybe we need "pg_catalog.pg_index_bloat" and
> "pg_catalog.pg_table_bloat" views including FILLFACTOR correction?)

A nice view that exposes a summary of information from the fsm per
table would be pretty handy.

In general there's a lot of data tied up in things like the fsm that
could be usefully exposed to users.

--
greg

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-06-15 16:40:14 Re: stray SIGALRM
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2013-06-15 16:07:18 Re: request a new feature in fuzzystrmatch