Re: Allow parallel plan for referential integrity checks?

From: "Gregory Stark (as CFM)" <stark(dot)cfm(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Frédéric Yhuel <frederic(dot)yhuel(at)dalibo(dot)com>
Cc: Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih(at)amazon(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Allow parallel plan for referential integrity checks?
Date: 2023-03-20 14:58:27
Message-ID: CAM-w4HNtzde4X+vdbcWkL1B91MefVFSkCKE=vW28strZq+hj5g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 12 Dec 2022 at 11:37, Frédéric Yhuel <frederic(dot)yhuel(at)dalibo(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I've planned to work on it full time on week 10 (6-10 March), if you
> agree to bear with me. The idea would be to bootstrap my brain on it,
> and then continue to work on it from time to time.

Any updates on this patch? Should we move it to next release at this
point? Even if you get time to work on it this commitfest do you think
it's likely to be committable in the next few weeks?

--
Gregory Stark
As Commitfest Manager

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Schoemans Maxime 2023-03-20 15:34:47 Re: Implement missing join selectivity estimation for range types
Previous Message Gregory Stark (as CFM) 2023-03-20 14:56:13 Re: explain analyze rows=%.0f