Re: Something for the TODO list: deprecating abstime and friends

From: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Something for the TODO list: deprecating abstime and friends
Date: 2017-07-16 20:27:32
Message-ID: CAM-w4HNUE63D4MdLr-M6Awe-qE6YUuANESg6UgzUBaXgugCa7A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 15 July 2017 at 23:00, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> While it's too late in the v10 cycle to do anything very meaningful
> about this now, I am tempted to strengthen the deprecation notice's
> wording from "might disappear" to "will disappear".

"Will certainly disappear at some unspecified date" is a lot less
convincing than "will disappear in 2021 in Postgres 14". The specific
year and version number is irrelevant
but picking and naming a specific one makes it a lot easier to follow
through come that date.

--
greg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2017-07-16 21:05:17 Re: More flexible LDAP auth search filters?
Previous Message Mark Cave-Ayland 2017-07-16 17:58:49 Re: More flexible LDAP auth search filters?