Re: SSL SNI

From: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SSL SNI
Date: 2021-02-26 02:40:03
Message-ID: CAM-w4HNShLYanJyYPS-93z8exgQ2161tmwJJfn=QupQw2onLbw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hate to be that guy but....

This still doesn't seem like it is IPv6-ready. Is there any harm in
having SNI with an IPv6 address there if it gets through?

In response to

  • Re: SSL SNI at 2021-02-25 15:58:28 from Peter Eisentraut

Responses

  • Re: SSL SNI at 2021-02-26 07:05:12 from Peter Eisentraut

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message iwata.aya@fujitsu.com 2021-02-26 02:52:49 RE: libpq debug log
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2021-02-26 02:34:47 Re: Disallow SSL compression?