Re: measuring lwlock-related latency spikes

From: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: measuring lwlock-related latency spikes
Date: 2012-03-31 12:58:51
Message-ID: CAM-w4HN1TGQgHxZzFEwsfYK6aYj9vW=Mm2knb31BOAyXeEPQAQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> But I didn't think we were ever supposed to hold content
> locks for that long.

Isn't that lock held while doing visibility checks? What about I/O
waiting for a clog page to be read?

--
greg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aidan Van Dyk 2012-03-31 13:36:07 Re: Http Frontend implemented using pgsql?
Previous Message Gabriele Bartolini 2012-03-31 12:25:51 Re: Patch pg_is_in_backup()