Re: Temporary tables versus wraparound... again

From: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Temporary tables versus wraparound... again
Date: 2022-03-22 01:27:08
Message-ID: CAM-w4HN+QpfOn=KrB_V7TMwnmq8n3sfUzMU2u_Ei_qySM+Da0Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

No problem, I can update the patch and check on the fuzz.

But the actual conflict is just in the test and I'm not sure it's
really worth having a test at all. It's testing a pretty low level
detail. So I'm leaning toward fixing the conflict by just ripping the
test out.

Nathan also pointed out there was a simpler way to get the pid. I
don't think the way I was doing it was wrong but I'll double check
that.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2022-03-22 01:28:28 Re: pg_ls_tmpdir to show directories and shared filesets (and pg_ls_*)
Previous Message Andres Freund 2022-03-22 01:25:39 Re: speed up a logical replica setup