| From: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Evan D(dot) Hoffman" <evandhoffman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Igor Neyman <ineyman(at)perceptron(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade fails, "mismatch of relation OID" - 9.1.9 to 9.2.4 |
| Date: | 2013-05-09 21:59:00 |
| Message-ID: | CAM-w4HMN1DnRa5aDEFn56vQ=8H-fRxRB2SYM6gv_=DwdBydC8g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> In any case, it seems like pg_upgrade ought to have a strategy for
> dealing with tables acquiring toast tables like this,
Acquiring toast tables seems pretty trivial to deal with. *Losing* a
toast table might be a bit more involved...
Neither seems intractable though.
--
greg
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-05-09 22:05:14 | Re: Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade fails, "mismatch of relation OID" - 9.1.9 to 9.2.4 |
| Previous Message | Larry Rosenman | 2013-05-09 21:43:10 | Re: LONG delete with LOTS of FK's |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-05-09 22:05:14 | Re: Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade fails, "mismatch of relation OID" - 9.1.9 to 9.2.4 |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2013-05-09 21:45:15 | Re: corrupt pages detected by enabling checksums |