Re: [RFC] overflow checks optimized away

From: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Xi Wang <xi(dot)wang(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] overflow checks optimized away
Date: 2015-12-03 16:08:16
Message-ID: CAM-w4HM7vQ-LZS8E3HS9+6hLHW_NSapkAfWJZneyCOKThXvEzA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
>> What version of GCC and other compilers did we decide we're targeting now?
>
> I can't see us moving the compiler goalposts one inch for this.

That's not the question I asked :/

--
greg

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Petr Jelinek 2015-12-03 16:19:53 Re: [DOCS] max_worker_processes on the standby
Previous Message Catalin Iacob 2015-12-03 15:57:53 Re: proposal: PL/Pythonu - function ereport