Re: Add A Glossary

Hello, everyone, I'm Roger, the tech writer who worked with Corey on the
glossary file. I just thought I'd announce that I am also on the list, and
I'm looking forward to any questions or comments people may have. Thanks!

On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 11:37 AM Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> This latest version is an attempt at merging the work of Jürgen Purtz into
> what I had posted earlier. There was relatively little overlap in the terms
> we had chosen to define.
>
> Each glossary definition now has a reference id (good idea Jürgen), the
> form of which is "glossary-term". So we can link to the glossary from
> outside if we so choose.
>
> I encourage everyone to read the definitions, and suggest fixes to any
> inaccuracies or awkward phrasings. Mostly, though, I'm seeking feedback on
> the structure itself, and hoping to get that committed.
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 11:22 PM Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> It seems like this could be a good idea, still the patch has been
>>> waiting on his author for more than two weeks now, so I have marked it
>>> as returned with feedback.
>>>
>>
>> In light of feedback, I enlisted the help of an actual technical writer
>> (Roger Harkavy, CCed) and we eventually found the time to take a second
>> pass at this.
>>
>> Attached is a revised patch.
>>
>>
>