| From: | Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: block-level incremental backup |
| Date: | 2019-07-17 14:08:07 |
| Message-ID: | CALtqXTf9S4j112wxyj3AiicUZqyO=6aC9RkkCYMJ=8E+ieg6xQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 6:43 PM Jeevan Chalke <
jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 2:15 PM Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>>
>> At what stage you will apply the WAL generated in between the START/STOP
>> backup.
>>
>
> In this design, we are not touching any WAL related code. The WAL files
> will
> get copied with each backup either full or incremental. And thus, the last
> incremental backup will have the final WAL files which will be copied as-is
> in the combined full-backup and they will get apply automatically if that
> the data directory is used to start the server.
>
Ok, so you keep all the WAL files since the first backup, right?
>
>
>> --
>> Ibrar Ahmed
>>
>
> --
> Jeevan Chalke
> Technical Architect, Product Development
> EnterpriseDB Corporation
>
>
--
Ibrar Ahmed
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2019-07-17 14:12:28 | Re: POC: converting Lists into arrays |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2019-07-17 13:51:48 | Re: Intermittent pg_ctl failures on Windows |