| From: | Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Paul A Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>, Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)protonmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges? |
| Date: | 2020-10-27 14:11:02 |
| Message-ID: | CALtqXTeJXQCb-ZEKazw8o51OmOujkaOQo6OkNQNOgtc0bzv3kg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 12:39 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 04:51:01PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > This patch had no reviews, unfortunately it cannot be applied
> > cleanly. Could you send a rebase please?
>
> This had no replies after two weeks, so I have marked the patch as
> RwF. Please feel free to resubmit if you are planning to work more on
> that.
> --
> Michael
>
I have spent some more time on the patch and did a lot of cleanup along
with some fixes, compilation errors, and warnings. There is a need for
another round of clean up to make that patch perfect. Currently, it based
on master (0525572860335d050a1bea194a5278c8833304d1). Regression is not
passing because it is dependent on the range_agg patch. Currently, I am
collecting all the TODO's and try to finish all of these.
The patch requires some reviews, so I am putting that again in the current
commitfest.
--
Ibrar Ahmed
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v0004-temporal-pk-fk-update-delete.patch | application/octet-stream | 142.7 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fabrízio de Royes Mello | 2020-10-27 14:11:40 | Re: Add important info about ANALYZE after create Functional Index |
| Previous Message | Fabrízio de Royes Mello | 2020-10-27 14:06:22 | Re: Add important info about ANALYZE after create Functional Index |