Re: [PROPOSAL] Temporal query processing with range types

From: Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Moser <pitiz29a(at)gmail(dot)com>, Anton Dignös <anton(dot)dignoes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Temporal query processing with range types
Date: 2019-08-02 21:00:22
Message-ID: CALtqXTcLnd+taZhecg0+65M8z0CJvuvotoQxuTMAeiMyRzQs0w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,
I have rebased the patch and currently reviewing the patch
on master (1e2fddfa33d3c7cc93ca3ee0f32852699bd3e012).

On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 4:45 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 2:12 AM Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > I start looking at the patch, there is a couple of problems with the
> patch. The first one is the OID conflict, which I fixed on my machine. The
> second problem is assertion failure. I think you have not compiled the
> PostgreSQL code with the assertion.
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> Looks like there was some good feedback for this WIP project last time
> around. It's currently in "Needs Review" status in the July
> Commitfest. To encourage more review and see some automated compile
> and test results, could we please have a fresh rebase? The earlier
> patches no longer apply.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Thomas Munro
> https://enterprisedb.com
>

--
Ibrar Ahmed

Attachment Content-Type Size
001_temporal_query_processing_with_range_types_v4.patch application/octet-stream 47.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2019-08-02 21:01:52 Re: partition routing layering in nodeModifyTable.c
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-08-02 20:49:33 Re: The unused_oids script should have a reminder to use the 8000-8999 OID range