From: | dinesh kumar <dineshkumar02(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] SQL function to report log message |
Date: | 2015-09-10 15:42:58 |
Message-ID: | CALnrH7pRjM+E34O4otnWLy8vetZrscONXGtf1LvqrTo=B5DNyQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:44 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
wrote:
> dinesh kumar wrote:
>
> > Also, I was under impression that, all our TODO
> > <https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo> items are filtered for the real
> use
> > cases. Is my impression wrong. If I wanted to work on another TODO item,
> > where i need to take a look.
>
> Your impression is completely, absolutely, horribly wrong.
>
>
:-)
> The TODO contains some ideas that are good but postponed, other ideas
> that are bad but we didn't know at the time they were recorded, other
> ideas that we don't know either way. Before doing anything on an item
> from the TODO list, you should first read the linked threads (if any),
> and keep track when they end with an email saying "what an awful idea".
> If this doesn't happen, _search_ for other threads not linked on the
> TODO list that also deal with the same topic; note if they end the same
> way (if you find such threads, it's useful to add a link to them in the
> TODO item).
>
Even if you can't find overly negative opinions about some item, discuss
> it here before doing any actual coding.
>
>
Sure.
> I wonder if we need a new page TONOTDO or something like that.
>
> --
> Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
>
--
Regards,
Dinesh
manojadinesh.blogspot.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2015-09-10 15:56:08 | Re: [PATCH] SQL function to report log message |
Previous Message | Fabien COELHO | 2015-09-10 15:15:26 | Re: checkpointer continuous flushing |