Re: AlterSubscription_refresh "wrconn" wrong variable?

From: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: AlterSubscription_refresh "wrconn" wrong variable?
Date: 2021-05-10 03:53:01
Message-ID: CALj2ACXpJW0mSyXVS9_kHs+08J+NsVFKcQbkr1T_octVNyrZ3g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 7:50 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > 0001 - Fixes the AlterSubscription_refresh as before.
> > 0002 - Renames the global var "wrconn" -> "LogRepWorkerWalRcvConn" as suggested.
>
> It seems that the 0001 part of this patch was pushed in the weekend [1]. Thanks!
>
> But what about the 0002 part? If there is no immediate plan to push
> that also then I will post a v5 just to stop the cfbot complaining.

I think the 0002 patch can be posted here, if it looks good, it can be
made "Ready For Committer".

With Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2021-05-10 04:11:08 Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach)
Previous Message vignesh C 2021-05-10 03:31:11 Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions