Re: Accommodate startup process in a separate ProcState array slot instead of in MaxBackends slots.

From: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Accommodate startup process in a separate ProcState array slot instead of in MaxBackends slots.
Date: 2022-03-29 07:21:35
Message-ID: CALj2ACXhER8K2oGDfOc=xwGH6QaddGQ5hSa3Q0RZwv2041H60g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 12:47 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 2:23 AM Bharath Rupireddy
> <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Thanks. It makes sense to put the comment in SInvalShmemSize.
> > Attaching v2 patch. Please review it.
>
> How about this version, which I have edited lightly for grammar?

Thanks. LGTM.

Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2022-03-29 07:24:17 Re: shared-memory based stats collector - v66
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2022-03-29 07:20:15 Re: logical replication empty transactions