Re: add timing information to pg_upgrade

From: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: add timing information to pg_upgrade
Date: 2023-08-02 07:32:53
Message-ID: CALj2ACXNN5_pqiHd7CNmsRfT+0duL=tgNiZCqYwALiWiB=YUew@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 12:45 PM Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
>
> On 01.08.23 17:45, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> > The message is too long, so there's no space between it and the "ok"
> > message:
> >
> > Checking for incompatible "aclitem" data type in user tablesok
> >
> > Instead of altering the messages, we could bump MESSAGE_WIDTH from 60 to
> > 62 or 64. Do you prefer that approach?
>
> I think we should change the output format to be more like initdb, like
>
> Doing something ... ok
>
> without horizontally aligning all the "ok"s.

While this looks simple, we might end up with a lot of diff and
changes after removing MESSAGE_WIDTH. There's a significant part of
pg_upgrade code that deals with MESSAGE_WIDTH. I don't think it's
worth the effort. Therefore, I'd prefer the simplest possible fix -
change the message to '"Checking for \"aclitem\" data type in user
tables". It may be an overkill, but we can consider adding
Assert(sizeof(message) < MESSAGE_WIDTH) in progress report functions
to not encourage new messages to end up in the same formatting issue.

--
Bharath Rupireddy
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yugo NAGATA 2023-08-02 07:37:53 Re: pgbnech: allow to cancel queries during benchmark
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2023-08-02 07:15:27 Re: add timing information to pg_upgrade