consistently use "ProcSignal" instead of "procsignal" in code comments

From: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: consistently use "ProcSignal" instead of "procsignal" in code comments
Date: 2021-11-05 05:52:27
Message-ID: CALj2ACX99ghPmm1M_O4r4g+YsXFjCn=qF7PeDXntLwMpht_Gdg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

I see that "procsignal" and "ProcSignal" are being used in the code
comments which look inconsistent. IMO, "ProcSignal" is the right word
to use and let's be consistent across the code comments. Attaching a
tiny patch for that.

Thoughts?

Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v1-0001-consistently-use-ProcSignal-instead-of-procsignal.patch application/octet-stream 1.3 KB

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2021-11-05 06:30:18 Re: [PATCH] Added TRANSFORM FOR for COMMENT tab completion
Previous Message Andrey Borodin 2021-11-05 05:50:53 Re: pglz compression performance, take two