Re: consistently use "ProcSignal" instead of "procsignal" in code comments

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: consistently use "ProcSignal" instead of "procsignal" in code comments
Date: 2021-11-09 03:51:39
Message-ID: 1f4d16ff-27c0-893e-0b17-5534d1f1d960@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2021/11/05 14:52, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see that "procsignal" and "ProcSignal" are being used in the code
> comments which look inconsistent. IMO, "ProcSignal" is the right word
> to use and let's be consistent across the code comments. Attaching a
> tiny patch for that.
>
> Thoughts?

I'm fine with this. Barring any objection, I will commit the patch.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2021-11-09 04:01:41 Re: consistently use "ProcSignal" instead of "procsignal" in code comments
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2021-11-09 03:51:15 Re: standby recovery fails (tablespace related) (tentative patch and discussion)