Re: Assertion failure in WaitForWALToBecomeAvailable state machine

From: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: noah(at)leadboat(dot)com, michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz, dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Assertion failure in WaitForWALToBecomeAvailable state machine
Date: 2022-09-15 10:25:54
Message-ID: CALj2ACX3dg7FrQ9XpcLK0Gd0VOM9P9LWxqbQrYAgAC9oLKHCRA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 3:56 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi
<horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > is that XLogShutdownWalRcv() does a bunch of work via ShutdownWalRcv()
> > - it calls ConditionVariablePrepareToSleep(),
>
> Anyway the code path is executed in almost all cases because the same
> assertion fires otherwise. So I don't see a problem if we do the bunch
> of synchronization things also in that rare case. I'm not sure we
> want to do [3].

IMO, we don't need to let ShutdownWalRcv() to do extra work of
ConditionVariablePrepareToSleep() - WalRcvRunning() -
ConditionVariableCancelSleep() for WALRCV_STOPPED cases when we know
the walreceiver status before - even though it doesn't have any
problems per se and at that place in the code the WALRCV_STOPPED cases
are more frequent than any other walreceiver cases.

Having said that, let's also hear from other hackers.

--
Bharath Rupireddy
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ranier Vilela 2022-09-15 11:26:34 Re: Avoid use deprecated Windows Memory API
Previous Message Ronan Dunklau 2022-09-15 10:25:06 Re: Fix gin index cost estimation